Articles Tagged: 62 F.3d 1424

62 F.3d 1424 76 A.F.T.R.2d 95-5946, 95-2 USTC P 50,472 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Parviz KARIM-PANAHI, Petitioner-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jerry Dempsey McINTYRE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Sherman HATCHER, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-15098. United States Court of Appeals, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Daniel B. VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-15494. United States […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Efrain J. LARGAESPADA-CASTELLANOS, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70137. United States Court […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Herbert J. HOUSEN; Potatoes and Vegetables Express, Petitioners,v.DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent. No. 94-70011. […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Orlando JAIME-LUMBIS; Aura Pajita De Jesus Jiron De Jaime, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.David A. HAWKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Chase RIVELAND, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-36020. United States Court of Appeals, […]

62 F.3d 1424 1995-2 Trade Cases P 71,112 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.E.W. FRENCH & SONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.GENERAL PORTLAND, INC., […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, a California Corporation,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PECO, INC., dba PECO Manufacturing Co., Inc., […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Karen K. GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Charles PAULSON; Charles Paulson, P.C., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35633. United States […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.David John FERTTERER and Richard J. Fertterer, Petitioner-Appellants,v.STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35763. […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Joseph Patrick KENNEDY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.G. H. BALDWIN, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35790. United States Court of […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Michael J. LOOMIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Arvon J. ARAVE, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35819. United States Court […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Michael J. LOOMIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James J. RENTIE, James Crosby, Kathy Lillybridge, JamesBarker, c/o Krone, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ronald W. HANCOCK, Petitioner-Appellant,v.OREGON STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-35926. United States […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Steve GILBERT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Edwin T. SHIMODA, Harold Falk, Vernon Moy, Jeanene Oshioro,Epe Purcell, Marion […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Michael McGEE, aka Mike McGee, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.F. A. BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-16827. United States […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Richard GREGERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David JEDELL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-16830. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.David Wilder FAUNCE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Theo WHITE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-17242. United States Court of Appeals, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.M. MELVIN GENTILE, D.O., LTD., an Arizona corporation; M.Melvin Gentile, D.O.; Anesthesia Associates […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Joseph E. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Samuel LEWIS, Director Arizona State Prisons, Roger Crist,Harold Whitley, Capt. […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Arturo GARAY-BURGOS, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-71016. United States Court of […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Herman FRITZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16339. United States Court of Appeals, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Joni GOLDYN, a/k/a Joan Carver, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.John MORAN, Defendant,andRichard Meyers; Elias Ghanem, Defendants-Appellees. No. […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Mark A. KOCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Samuel A. LEWIS, Department of Corrections; Roger Crist,Warden, complex for […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Paul JACOBI, Plaintiff-Appelant,v.Bruce DINMAN; Reid Nakamura; Stephen Elisha; Phil Lahne; andArlette Harada, Defendants-Appellees. […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ann JUETTE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.The REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a publiccorporation, […]

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.John DOE, M.D., by Curtis LAVERY, Executor of his Estate,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ATTORNEY GENERAL of the […]