Articles Tagged: 62 F.3d 1423

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Vicente AGUILAR-LOPEZ, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70576. United States Court of […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Cora BENOZA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TARGET PERSONNEL SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-15047. United States Court of Appeals, […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Samuel ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bruce J. SOTTILE, L.A. County Superior Court Judge; EDWARDA. HINZ, JR.; […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Michael K. BODEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation; CFIndustries Inc., a corporation, […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Paul M. ALLEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PORTLAND POLICE BUREAU; L. C. Sweeney and Unnamed Officers,Defendants-Appellees. No. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Douglas Scott COUGHENOUR; Laura Roth-Coughenour, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.STATE AUTO PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Carlos Barela CHAVARIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.G. TRUJILLO; C. Lopez; Rodrigo Brizuela, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56376. United […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Alfred BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Laura WARNER, dba Laura Warner; USD Legal Clinic, dba USDLegal Clinic; […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.In re ALLUSTIARTE, Debtor.Ben W. ALLUSTIARTE; Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors-Appellants,v.UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; W. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Gregory W. BOUDETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.William Curtis SINGER; CITY OF COTTONWOOD, Arizona, aMunicipal Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Louis G. BEARY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF ROHNERT PARK; Jimmie Rogers, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jerry Carl BARNES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James GOMEZ, Director; Mike Carrillo; and Lt. R. A. Garza,Defendants-Appellees. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Daniel Steve DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.S. BONACCORSO, Administrator at FSP B Facility; M. H.Tristan, Coordinator […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Wanda BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MASSACHUSETTS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, aka: MassCasualty, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56619. United States […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.James E. BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Robert BORG; C.J. Johnson; V. Valdez; S. Larson; M.F.Martel; P. […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jimmy H. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Shirley S. CHATER,* Commissioner of SocialSecurity, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-36145. United […]

62 F.3d 1423 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8882 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Julio C. ACEBEY; L. Clifford Adams, Jr.; David C. Adelman;Vinod […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Richard L. CHAFFIN; Robert M. Clue; Clarence Bradford; JohnCampbell; John Luce; and John […]

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Devin K. CALLIHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. […]