59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Salvador MUNOZ-TRIANA, Refugio Barajas-Mejia, JesusMartinez-Gutierrez, and Simon Castorena-Sotelo,Defendants-Appellants. Nos. […]
Articles Tagged: 59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Leon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50543. United States Court of […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Eric Germaine TURNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50198. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jacob Acevedo PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50249. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Alejandro ROSAS-DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50511. United States Court of […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Francisco MEJIA-CENDEJAS, aka: Francisco Mejia Cendejas,Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50523. United […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luis Alberto SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10451, 94-10452. United States […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Jon McNELLY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10526. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.William C. VOSBURGH, Defendant-Appellant No. 94-35635. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Terry Andre WALKER, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Tana WOOD, Superintendent of the Washington StatePenitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-36016. […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kenneth Lamont PAULK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50085. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David STRAUCH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10195. United States Court of […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carl Ernest WHITTENBURG, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10206. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lorenzo TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10334. United States Court of […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dale SHEPARD, a.k.a. Arthur Zelson, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10391. United […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Ramon ZAZUETA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10393. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David E. VINCENT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10769. United States Court […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Patrick Kelly SHORB, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-30449, 93-30450. United States […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mike WYMORE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.OREGON STATE HOSPITAL, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-36129. United States Court of Appeals, […]
59 F.3d 177
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rod WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC.; Gary Goodman; Keith Malner,Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55739. United States […]