Articles Tagged: 34 F.3d 1072

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas E. HAYES, Agretech Trustee, Steven Guttman, FPITrustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY, […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Richard L. LOCKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PIERCE COUNTY; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35187. United States Court […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.James Kenneth McELDOWNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BAR EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-55036. United […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Mark Frederick DURBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.LOCAL 52 INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S AND WAREHOUSEMENSUNION; Pacific Maritime Association, Defendants-Appellees. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Tommy MARTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.J.D. SWINSON, Warden; C.E. Floyd, Warden; Larry G. Mayo,et al., […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Darryl J. JOE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PAYCO-GENERAL AMERICAN CREDITS, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-15338. United States Court […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Donnell MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.B.J. BUNNELL, Superintendent; Attorney General ofCalifornia, Respondents-Appellees. No. 93-56730. United States […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Leroy GRIFFIN, aka Lee, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SARGENT CONTROLS INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15123. United […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Donald Russell HAMILTON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.B.J. BUNNELL, Warden; Attorney General of the State ofCalifornia, Respondents-Appellees. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Dewitt Darren JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Charles MARSHALL; Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General ofthe State of […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Andrew Lewis McCARTER, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Brian GUNN, Warden, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-55987. United States […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Nora NMI LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56093. United States Court […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Alan FAWCETT, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Lloyd F. HAMES, Commissioner, Commissioner of Corrections,State of Alaska, Respondent-Appellee. No. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Timothy D. NAEGELE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-55590. United States […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Elizabeth Diane DOWNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Eldon VAIL, Superintendent, WCCW; Charlotte Blackwell,Superintendent, EMCF; Robert Schieldler,Superintendent, OWCC, […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Robert A. FISHER, Trustee, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-36182. United States […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.John D. MERRIFIELD, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Arvon J. ARAVE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-35936. United States Court […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Robert FISCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35610. United States Court of […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Calvin KUHLMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,andErnest HUERTAS, Plaintiff,v.SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY; Seattle Housing Authority, abody corporate and […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Mable T. HUDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; Petrina K. Romo,Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17209. United […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Andrew DOLFINI, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Samuel LEWIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17284. United States Court of […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Mark Tanner MARCHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,v.George HERMAN; Attorney General of the State of Arizona,Respondents-Appellees. No. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Dixianne HAWKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF BUTTE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15346. United States Court […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.In re Richard P. HIGGINS, Debtor.Richard P. HIGGINS, Appellant,v.DELTAM SYSTEM, INC., Appellee. No. […]

34 F.3d 1072 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94-6202 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Marianne KELLER; Howard H. Keller, Petitioners-Appellees,v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.GMI HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Bill BAILEY; Bill D/B/A Genie Garage Door Service,Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-56437. […]

34 F.3d 1072 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.INTERPOOL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.E.C. YANG, Defendant,andChar Yigh Marine (Panama) S.A. Defendant-Appellant.INTERPOOL LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CHAR CHING […]