25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Richard ROEv.DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellant. No. […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Larry D. CANNON, Appellant,v.Peter JACKSON, Administrator, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.James A. ALSTONv.WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.DETROIT/WAYNE COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY, Petitioner,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Karem WILSON, Appellant. […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Rodney B. SHIELDS, on behalf of […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.RESEARCH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Petitionerv.NATIONAL LABOR […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Julian M. JOHNSON, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Enoch R. SEWARD, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Donald Gene HENTHORN, Appellant,v.Kathleen HAWK, Director, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Edgar W. HOWARD, Appellant,v.Zell MILLER, Governor […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.Robert E. FRITCHEY, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Keith James FORD, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.UNITED STATES of Americav.Maxwell S. KRAFT, […]

Read More

25 F.3d 1115

25 F.3d 1115 306 U.S.App.D.C. 409 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC., Petitioner,v.UNITED […]

Read More