Category: 56 F.3d ___

56 F.3d 979 40 ERC 1801, 63 USLW 2777, 25 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,250 NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES, a Non-Profit OregonCorporation; and Nina Bell, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY OF PORTLAND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-35044. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1993.Opinion Filed Dec. 10, 1993.Opinion Withdrawn June 7, 1995.Decided June 7, 1995. Patrick A. Parenteau, Perkins […]

56 F.3d 977 31 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1271 BELLE-MIDWEST, INC., Appellant,v.MISSOURI PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE GUARANTEEASSOCIATION, Appellee. No. 94-3721. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 14, 1995.Decided June 14, 1995.Rehearing Denied July 18, 1995. 1 James C. Ochs, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellant. 2 Robert William Cockerham, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellee. 3 […]

56 F.3d 993 31 Fed.R.Serv.3d 769 Angel MARTEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Elias Cuevas; Harry Delong;Richard Mariadiaga; Mark Shaughnessy, et al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-56268. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1993.Decided April 12, 1994.Order Granting Rehearing En Banc Nov. 14, 1994.Argued and Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.Decided June 1, 1995. Thomas E. […]

56 F.3d 966 10 IER Cases 1227 Kevin TINDLE, Appellant,v.Lou CAUDELL, individually and in his capacity as Chief ofPolice for the City of Little Rock; City ofLittle Rock, Arkansas, Appellees. No. 94-3474. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 12, 1995.Decided June 9, 1995. Robert Alston Newcomb, Little Rock, AR, argued (Edward Glenn Adcock, […]

56 F.3d 973 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Ronald Wendell DOWNS, Sr., Appellant. 94-3404. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 14, 1995.Decided June 13, 1995. John L. Lane, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued, for appellant. Robert L. Teig, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cedar Rapids, IA, argued, for appellee. Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge; HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge; […]

56 F.3d 947 41 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1181 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Lavandris JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-2958. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995.Decided June 8, 1995. William S. Margulis, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellant. Joseph M. Landolt, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellee. Before BOWMAN, Circuit […]

56 F.3d 959 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Darrin JACKSON, Appellant. No. 94-3401. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 13, 1995.Decided June 8, 1995. Jeffrey P. Heineman, Omaha, NE, argued for appellant. Robert F. Kokrda, Omaha, NE, argued (Thomas J. Monaghan, on the brief) for appellee. Before McMILLIAN, FAGG and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. McMILLIAN, […]

56 F.3d 961 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2520, 130 Lab.Cas. P 11,348 Jack POTTER, individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated; Warner Hurt, individually andon behalf of all others similarlysituated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.; United Mine Workersof America, Local 7688, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-3663. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1995.Decided June 8, […]

56 F.3d 946 Marlon ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ann M. MERICLE; Marilyn Butts; Dell Koonce; Exon;Michael Stianche, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-3502. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 14, 1995.Decided June 6, 1995. Barbara H. Frazier, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellants. Mary L. Frontczak, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellee. Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge, HANSEN, Circuit Judge, […]

56 F.3d 941 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 522 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carl BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-3339. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1995.Decided June 6, 1995.Rehearing Denied July 17, 1995. Mark R. Brown, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued for appellant. Daniel Christopher Tvedt, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued (Patrick J. Reinert, on […]

56 F.3d 934 Nimali DeSilva SONDEL; Holly Novack; Kim Shaller; BrendaGlapa; Stephanie Sangsoon Chung; Denise Johnson,on behalf of themselves and all otherssimilarly situated, Appellants,v.NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.; Republic Airlines, Appellees.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae. No. 94-2524. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 15, 1995.Decided June 6, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for RehearingEn Banc DeniedAug. […]

56 F.3d 918 Timothy RUSH, Appellant,v.James SMITH, Silas Hardison, David Robbins, James Conway,Rita Krapf, Nesby Moore, Vincent Schoemehl, Appellees. No. 93-3585. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 13, 1995.Decided June 5, 1995. Kenneth Dick, St. Louis, MO, argued for (Donald Singer, on the brief). James J. Wilson, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellees […]

56 F.3d 932 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-2629 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Emile RABINOWITZ, Appellant. No. 94-2495. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 14, 1995.Decided June 6, 1995. Peter J. Thompson, Minneapolis, MN, argued (John W. Lundquist, on the brief), for appellant. Andrew Mark Luger, Minneapolis, MN, argued (David L. Lillehaug and Douglas R. Peterson, […]

56 F.3d 889 Jimmie L. WEEKLEY, Appellee,v.Jimmie JONES, Appellant. No. 94-2064. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 11, 1995.Decided June 1, 1995. Stacy Louise Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, argued, for appellant. Michael Herman Maguire, Cape Girardeau, MO, argued, for appellee. Before McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS […]

56 F.3d 898 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John J. RODAMAKER, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kaye A. RODAMAKER, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-3758, 94-3759. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 11, 1995.Decided June 2, 1995. Jonathan B. Hammond, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant John Rodamaker. Keith E. Uhl, Des Moines, IA, for appellant Kaye Rodamaker. Kandice […]

56 F.3d 904 100 Ed. Law Rep. 920 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff/Appellee,Anne Mitchell; Bob Moore; Pat Gee; Pat Rayburn; Mary J.Gage; North Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association;Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers; Little RockClassroom Teachers Association; Alexa Armstrong; KarlosArmstrong; Ed Bullington; Khayyam Davis; Janice Dent;John Harrison; Alvin Hudson; Tatia Hudson; and MiltonJackson, Appellants,Lorene Joshua; Leslie […]

56 F.3d 873 Vernon S. KRIMMEL, Appellant,v.Frank X. HOPKINS, Warden, Nebraska State Penitentiary, Appellee. No. 93-3534. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 13, 1995.Decided May 30, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for RehearingEn Banc DeniedAug. 1, 1995. Andrew D. Strotman, Lincoln, NE, argued for appellant. Kimberly A. Klein, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, NE, argued, for […]

56 F.3d 878 Marvin C. JONES, Appellant,v.Paul DELO, Appellee. No. 94-2849. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1995.Decided May 31, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept.26, 1995.* R. Thomas Day, Asst. Federal Public Defender, argued, for appellant. Michael J. Spillane, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued, for appellee. Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, […]

56 F.3d 849 32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 367 A.J., by his mother and next friend, L.B., on behalf ofhimself and all others similarly situated, Appellant,v.David KIERST, Jr., in his official capacity as JuvenileOfficer; Jim Morrison, in his official capacity as Directorof Residential Services; Sherman Williams, in his officialcapacity as Director of Detention; Judge Edith L. Messina,in her […]

56 F.3d 85 312 U.S.App.D.C. 121, 63 USLW 2769,10 IER Cases 1025 William SANJOUR, et al., Appellants,v.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Appellees. No. 92-5123. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued In Banc Feb. 9, 1994.Decided May 30, 1995. Stephen M. Kohn, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants. […]

56 F.3d 866 NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION; Atlanta Hawks, Ltd.;Capital Bullets Basketball Club, Inc.; Celtics, LimitedPartnership; Charlotte NBA, Limited Partnership; DallasBasketball, Limited; Denver Nuggets, Limited Partnership;Detroit Pistons Basketball Company; Golden State Warriors;Houston Rockets Professional Basketball Club, Ltd.; JazzBasketball Investors, Inc.; LAC Basketball Club, Inc.; LosAngeles Lakers, Inc.; Madison Square Garden Corporation;Meadowlands Basketball Associates; Miami Heat, LimitedPartnership; […]

56 F.3d 866 Amy FRIEDMAN, Appellant,v.FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., and other Fidelityentities, real names unknown; Fidelity ServiceCorporation; National FinancialServices Corporation, Appellees. No. 94-3433. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1995.Decided May 8, 1995. Frederick S. Cassman, Omaha, NE, for appellant. Kathleen M. Quinn, Omaha, NE, for appellee. Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, […]

56 F.3d 84NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 841 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Henry HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-2478. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 20, 1995.Decided June 12, 1995. William R. Hogan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charles Ex (argued), Office of the U.S. Atty., Crim. Div., and Barry Rand Elden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of the U.S. Atty., Crim. Receiving, […]

56 F.3d 844 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2538, 63 USLW 2794,130 Lab.Cas. P 11,349 GLASS, MOLDERS, POTTERY, PLASTICS AND ALLIED WORKERSINTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, LOCAL 182B,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.EXCELSIOR FOUNDRY COMPANY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-3734. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 13, 1995.Decided June 13, 1995. Arthur J. Martin, Charles A. Werner, Schuchat, Cook & Werner, […]

56 F.3d 84NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 832 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-2707 Stephanie A. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-4049. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 13, 1995.Decided June 8, 1995. A. Benjamin Goldgar, Marianne C. Holzhall (argued), Keck, Mahin & Cate, Chicago, IL, for plaintiff-appellant. Sue Hendricks Bailey, Asst. U.S. Atty., Indianapolis, IN, Gary R. Allen, Murray […]

56 F.3d 84NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 84NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 84NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83wNOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 821 MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT, a special purposeWisconsin municipal, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Marylandcorporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-1896. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Feb. 16, 1995.Decided June 7, 1995. Michael J. McCabe, Robert Crawford (argued), Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Dist., Legal Services, Milwaukee, WI, for Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage Dist. Gerald […]

56 F.3d 825 63 USLW 2804, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,763,Comm. Fut. L. Rep. P. 26,427 Helmut FRIETSCH, Horst Gerhard Hess, Manfred Schneider,Siegfried Koegler, and Martin Gerweck,individually and on behalf of all otherssimilarly situated, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.REFCO, INCORPORATED, Stuart Trading Company, and William A.Stuart, III, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-3778. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 83NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 81NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 81NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 817 Willie D. WHITE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Rick OLIG, James M. Gilmore, and Fond du Lac County, amunicipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-3840. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued April 10, 1995.Decided June 6, 1995. 1 Ronald Bornstein, Milwaukee, WI (argued), for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Thomas P. Stilp, Stilp, Cotton & Wells, Milwaukee, WI (argued), for […]

56 F.3d 82NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 81NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]

56 F.3d 81NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of […]