Category: 54 F.3d ___

54 F.3d 994 41 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1107 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Talal H. ALZANKI, Defendant, Appellant. No. 94-1645. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Nov. 8, 1994.Decided June 1, 1995. Michael A. Collora, with whom David A. Bunis and Dwyer & Collora, Boston, MA, were on brief, for appellant. S. Theodore Merritt, […]

54 F.3d 931 67 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1474 Genevieve SCARFO, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.Genevieve SCARFO, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.Brian Miller, Plaintiff-Appellee.Brian MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees.Genevieve A. Scarfo, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 94-1929, 94-1982, and 94-1983. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Jan. 12, 1995.Decided May 12, 1995. […]

54 F.3d 967 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Terrence TAYLOR, Defendant, Appellant. No. 93-1381. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard April 3, 1995.Decided May 17, 1995. Judith H. Mizner, by appointment of the court, Newburyport, MA, for appellant. Kimberly S. Budd, Asst. U.S. Atty, with whom Donald K. Stern, U.S. Atty., Boston, MA, was on […]

54 F.3d 980 63 USLW 2761 Wilfredo MARTINEZ, a/k/a Wilfredo Martinez Rodriguez,Plaintiff, Appellant,v.Rafael COLON, a/k/a Rafael Colon Pizarro, et al.,Defendants, Appellees. No. 94-2138. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard April 3, 1995.Decided May 31, 1995.Rehearing Denied June 20, 1995. John E. Mudd, Towson, MD, with whom Howard Charles and Ortiz Toro & Ortiz Brunet […]

54 F.3d 908 Lloyd MATTHEWS, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Paul RAKIEY, et al., Superintendent at MCI-Walpole,Defendant, Appellant. No. 94-2017. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Feb. 9, 1995.Decided May 8, 1995. Linda Nutting Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen., with whom Scott Harshbarger, Atty. Gen., Boston, MA, was on brief, for appellant. Stephen Hrones, Boston, MA, orally, Lloyd Matthews, […]

54 F.3d 92 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Christopher MOORE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 790, Docket 94-1330. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Jan. 10, 1995.Decided April 25, 1995. J. Bruce Maffeo, Bernstein & Maffeo, New York City (Michele C. Cacioppo, Bernstein & Maffeo, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellant. Leonard Lato, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, […]

54 F.3d 9 67 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1001,66 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,607Udo U. UDO, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.Henry TOMES, Commissioner for the Department of MentalHealth, Defendant, Appellee. No. 94-1931. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard Feb. 7, 1995.Decided April 28, 1995. John A. Birknes, Jr., New Bedford, MA, for appellant. Deborah S. Steenland, Asst. Atty. […]

54 F.3d 900 312 U.S.App.D.C. 67, 130 Lab.Cas. P 33,247,19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1538,2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1285 TOM MISTICK & SONS, INC., Appellant,v.Robert B. REICH, Appellee. No. 93-5376. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 17, 1995.Decided June 9, 1995. Maurice Baskin, Washington, DC, argued the cause for appellant. […]

54 F.3d 893 312 U.S.App.D.C. 60, Util. L. Rep. P 14,043 TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Public Service Electric & Gas Company, et al., Intervenors. No. 93-1632. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 24, 1995.Decided June 9, 1995. Michael J. Fremuth argued the cause for petitioner. With […]

54 F.3d 862 Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,972, 312 U.S.App.D.C. 29 USED EQUIPMENT SALES, INC., Petitioner,v.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; Federal HighwayAdministration; Federico F. Pena, Secretary ofTransportation, Respondents. No. 93-1675. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Dec. 2, 1994.Decided May 23, 1995. William E. Kenworthy, Washington, DC, argued the cause and filed the briefs […]

54 F.3d 868 312 U.S.App.D.C. 35 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Jannazzo D. BOYD, Appellant. No. 93-3036. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 22, 1995.Decided May 30, 1995. Allen E. Burns, Asst. Federal Public Defender, argued the cause, for appellant. On brief was A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender. Mary D. Rodriguez, Asst. […]

54 F.3d 873 40 ERC 2012, 312 U.S.App.D.C. 40, 75A.F.T.R.2d 95-2576,25 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,207 FLORIDA AUDUBON SOCIETY, et al., Appellants,v.Lloyd M. BENTSEN, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., Appellees. No. 94-5178. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 27, 1995.Decided June 2, 1995. James W. Moorman, Washington, DC, argued the cause […]

54 F.3d 888 Fed. Carr. Cas. P 83,977, 312 U.S.App.D.C. 55 Jeff MacLEOD, Trustee for BGR Transportation, Inc., Petitioner,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION; United States of America,Respondents. No. 93-1363. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 8, 1994.Decided June 6, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied Aug. 9, 1995. Robert B. Walker, […]

54 F.3d 825 311 U.S.App.D.C. 421 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.Virginia L. FERRARA, in her official capacity as the ChiefDisciplinary Counsel of the Disciplinary Board ofthe Supreme Court of New Mexico,Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 93-5233, 93-5250. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Dec. 8, 1994.Decided May 19, 1995.As Amended July 28, 1995. Douglas Letter, […]

54 F.3d 834 312 U.S.App.D.C. 1 JAJ CELLULAR, et al., Appellants,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee.Metro Mobile CTS of Phoenix, Inc., et al., Intervenors. Nos. 94-1021, 94-1024. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 24, 1995.Decided May 19, 1995. Louis Gurman, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for appellants. With him on the joint briefs […]

54 F.3d 85 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Joseph Frank WHITELEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 937, Docket 94-1416. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued Dec. 14, 1994.Decided April 24, 1995. David T. Grudberg, Jacobs, Grudberg, Belt, and Dow, New Haven, CT, for defendant-appellant Joseph Frank Whiteley. Jonathan A. Bailey, Asst. U.S. Atty., District of Conn. (Christopher F. […]

54 F.3d 857 312 U.S.App.D.C. 24 FLORIDA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,Petitioners,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and United States ofAmerica, Respondents,AT & T Corporation, et al., Intervenors. Nos. 91-1486, 92-1356. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 14, 1995.Decided May 23, 1995. Robert F. Aldrich argued the cause, for petitioners, Florida Pay Telecommunications […]

54 F.3d 842 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2338, 312 U.S.App.D.C. 9 AMERICAN TRAIN DISPATCHERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,Respondents,CSX Transportation, Inc., Intervenor. No. 94-1036. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 27, 1995.Decided May 19, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied July21, 1995. Gordon P. MacDougall argued […]

54 F.3d 820 311 U.S.App.D.C. 416 UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Appellant,v.Christopher Rufus WILLIAMS, Appellee. No. 94-5284. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued April 19, 1995.Decided May 16, 1995.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied July 20, 1995. Margaret M. Lawton, Asst. U.S. Atty., argued the cause, for appellant. With her on […]

54 F.3d 789 311 U.S.App.D.C. 385 The AMERICAN LEGION, Appellant,v.Edward DERWINSKI, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs;Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health and HumanServices; William L. Roper, M.D., Director, Centers forDisease Control; Vernon N. Houk, Director, Center forEnvironmental Health and Injury Control Center; UnitedStates of America, Appellees.VIETNAM VETERANS OF AMERICA; Harold A. Butler; CarolRidolfi-Delaney; Marel […]

54 F.3d 802 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2285, 311 U.S.App.D.C.398, 63 USLW 2750,130 Lab.Cas. P 11,336 LEACH CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,International Association of Machinists and AerospaceWorkers, District Lodge 94, Local Lodge 102,AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 93-1707. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 24, 1995.Decided May 12, 1995. William H. Emer, Los […]

54 F.3d 811 149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2271, 311 U.S.App.D.C.407, 63 USLW 2712,130 Lab.Cas. P 57,918 WASHINGTON SERVICE CONTRACTORS COALITION, et al., Appellees,v.DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., and Service EmployeesInternational Union and Service EmployeesInternational Union, Local 82, Appellants. Nos. 94-7143, 94-7144. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 27, 1995.Decided May 12, 1995.Rehearing […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788 68 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 256 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788 130 Lab.Cas. P 11,335 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-2255, 95-1 USTC P 50,276 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 788NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787 6 NDLR P 300 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario Reul NAJERA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF CALIFORNIA-PRISON INDUSTRY AUTHORITY; David King;Linda Clifford; Rick Reyes, […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mario Reul NAJERA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS; Tomasa Schultz;David King; et […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Claude L. VALOT; Barbara Valot, Plaintiffs-Appelants,v.Morris D. ENGLISH, Sr.; Morris D. English, Jr.; […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rudy Leonardo Penate ROMERO, Felix Hubert Penate Romero, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. […]

54 F.3d 787NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Henry D. ZEGZULA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30199. United States Court […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose SANCHEZ-MONTOYA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30225. United States Court of […]

54 F.3d 786 100 Ed. Law Rep. 65 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.In re NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vancile A. WHITE, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,v.James H. GOMEZ, Director, California Department ofCorrections; George Smith, […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos Briseno ZUNIGA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30137. United States Court […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Walter Eugene SMITH, a/k/a Blair D. Kennedy, a/k/a BlairDwayne […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Allen Ray HECKARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30160. United States Court […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark S. NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Ron ANGELONE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16434. United States Court […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfred SWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Ron ANGELONE; Karl L. Sannicks; Robin Bates; PatriciaMcGaffin, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16740. […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Florence O’LEARY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF SACRAMENTO; Roman Catholic Church of Sacramento;Stewart Title of Sacramento, […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dion Lamont DANIELS, and Sherard Duprees Hicks, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. […]

54 F.3d 786NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The PEOPLE OF the TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Henry Babauta SANTOS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-10347. […]