Category: 46 F.3d ___

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Perry Adron McCULLOUGH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55783. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 1142 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-838 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Robert B. LEMON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.M. MARTIN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55594. […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Tyrone JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Robert G. BORG, Warden; Attorney General of California,Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55147. United […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Christine A. McGREEVY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon corporation,Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-35038. United […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jerry LATTIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jack McCORMICK, Warden; Beverly Beck; Curt Chisholm; MikeMahoney; State of Montana, […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Maurice J. McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Robert LUCHIRINI, Clark County D.A., Office of the ClarkCounty D.A.; […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Alejandro O. LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Samuel LEWIS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15948. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Paul Francis LEWIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15849. United States […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Cody LARUM, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SILVER STATE INDUSTRIES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15623. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.JORDAN UNDERWRITERS SERVICES, INC.; Stephen C. Jordan;Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.INTREPID INSURANCE CO., a West Virginia corporation, […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ruben HYMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.George DEEDS, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15546. United States Court of […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jack W. KASPER, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; National TransportationSafety Board, Respondents. No. 93-70729. United […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Jack W. KASPER, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD; Federal AviationAdministration, Respondents. No. 93-70631. United […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Catlin JANJAC and Ansly Janjac, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70479. United […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Carmelita JOSE, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70432. United States Court of […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.LOCOMOTOR USA, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant,v.KORUS COMPANY, INC., a California corporation; Kyong […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.James JACKSON, Plaintiff – Appellant,v.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; William Stewart, Director, InternalServices Department, […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.LANCER INSURANCE COMPANY, Lancer Management Company, Inc.,Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellants,v.D.W. FERGUSON & ASSOCIATES, Douglas W. Ferguson,Defendants/Counter-Claim […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.The MANCHESTER GROUP, a Nevada Corporation, et al.; DouglasManchester, an individual and as […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Adam Russell JEFFERS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Len CHASTAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 93-55062. United States Court of […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Wondiyrad KABEDE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17062. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 1142 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Johnny LOCKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Joseph D. SCALZO, individually and as Medical Administrator;P.A. Jones, Evelyn Nash, […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward GARFIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF MESA; Guy Meeks, City of Mesa Police Department,Police […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Clara HAMILTON, individually & as Special Administratrix ofthe Estate of Keith Hamilton; Plaintiff-Appellee,v.COUNTY […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ricardo Amador HUITRON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-55805. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ed Avila GARCIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Brian S. GUNN; H. A. Rippetoe; P. D. Washington; P. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Robert Bernall GORDON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Eddie S. YLST, Warden, California Department of Corrections,et al., Respondents-Appellees. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Paul Steven GROOVER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; City of San DiegoPolice […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Victor James HARROD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.GLACIER STEEL BUILDINGS, INC.; Tom Sullivan, President;Jay Kiser, Operations […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Richard FREDERICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Gary WRIGHT; George Burke; City of Forest Grove; and JohnDoe, a […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Scott A. HIGGINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Lloyd F. HAMES, Commissioner; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35284. United […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Marie R. FULOP, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Priscilla A. HAMILTON, U.S.A.A. Casualty Insurance, HallsEmergency, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Leonard John HODGSON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Daniel VASQUEZ, et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-16249. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Bobby Dean FRANKLIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16179. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 1141 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-808, 95-1 USTC P 60,189 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Charles T. FROH, Petitioner-Appellant,v.COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Hossein HAMZAVI, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70459. United States Court of […]

46 F.3d 1141 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-572, 95-1 USTC P 50,056 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Harry GERMAN, Jr. and Carol German, […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Makis A. HAVADJIAS; Haralambos Havadjias, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56693. United States […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Rick Alan GONZALES, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Wayne ESTELLE; Attorney General of the State of California,Respondents-Appellees. No. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.In re Isidor FRIEDMAN and Dorothy Friedman, Debtor.Isidor FRIEDMAN; Dorothy Friedman, Appellants,v.Philip C. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Tan Sheng HUANG, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55770. United […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Rene Paul GERMAINE, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Eddie MEYERS, Warden; Attorney General for the State ofCalifornia, Respondents-Appellees. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Don HALPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-55335. United […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Ronald S. GLOW, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Nancy HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellantv.EVENFLO CORPORATION, a foreign corp., d/b/a Evenflo JuvenileCo., a foreign corp.; […]

46 F.3d 988 Abdi DULANE, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-9504. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Jan. 26, 1995. Daniel M. Kowalski, Denver, CO, for petitioner. Alison R. Drucker, Office of Immigration Litigation, Dept. of Justice (Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Office of Immigration Litigation, Dept. of Justice, Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., […]

46 F.3d 1141 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,878 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.GLACIER OPTICAL, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.OPTIQUE DU […]

46 F.3d 979 Eddie MAES, Petitioner/Appellant,v.John THOMAS, Warden; and Attorney General of the State ofNew Mexico, Respondents/Appellees. No. 93-2237. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Jan. 23, 1995. 1 Tova Indritz, Federal Public Defender, Albuquerque, NM, for petitioner/appellant. 2 Margaret E. McLean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, NM (Tom Udall, Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, NM, […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.HEALTH SYSTEMS GROUP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35500. United […]

46 F.3d 1141 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Robert GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Donna W. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35497. […]

46 F.3d 975 John W. FRANDSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.WESTINGHOUSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-4154. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. Jan. 23, 1995. 1 B. Ray Zoll of Zoll & Branch, Salt Lake City, UT, on the brief for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Tracy H. Fowler of Campbell, Maack & Sessions, Salt Lake City, UT, for defendant-appellee. 3 Before KELLY, […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Vincent Tyrone BAYLIS, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Samuel LEWIS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-15651. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 970 63 USLW 2505 Kathryn MOSER; National Association of TelecomputerOperators, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, a federal agency; JamesH. Quello, in his capacity as interim Chairman ofthe Federal Communications Commission,Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-35686. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 31, 1994.Decided Feb. 6, 1995. Mark B. Stern, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, […]

46 F.3d 970 INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.TRANSCON LINES, a corporation; Leonard L. Gumport, Chapter7 Trustee, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-55036. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Feb. 3, 1995. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 In ICC v. Transcon Lines, — U.S. —-, 115 S.Ct. 689, […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Richard BLUE-SKY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James GOMEZ, Director, Teena Farmon, Warden CCWF, R. E.Stebbins, Correctional Officer, […]

46 F.3d 969 Mark ST. ANGELO, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 17,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.VICTORIA FARMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15254. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Feb. 2, 1995. Before: CHOY, POOLE, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The opinion, 38 F.3d 1525, is amended as follows: the last paragraph of page 13245 [p. 1532] of the slip […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Arturo M. BOWMANE, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Vince G. SWINNEY; Justice Court; Dorothy Nash Holmes; Jo AnnWilson; […]

46 F.3d 961 1995 A.M.C. 1096 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Olaf Peter JUDA; Raymond Edward Missell; Anthony Burg;Frans Gustaaf Van Der Hoeven; and ChristopherDean Paris, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-10439, 93-10721, 93-10724, 93-10729 and 93-10730. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 4, 1994.Decided Feb. 2, 1995. Diane Marie Amann, San Francisco, CA, for […]

46 F.3d 956 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2851, Pens. Plan Guide P 23905FPamela J. McLEOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.OREGON LITHOPRINT INC., an Oregon corporation, dbaNews-Register Publishing Co.; and News-RegisterEmployees’ Insurance Plan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36928. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1994.Decided Feb. 1, 1995. Leslie L. Wellman, Wellman & Murray, Portland, OR, for […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Dev ANAND; Sheetal Anand; Arachana Anand, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70872. […]

46 F.3d 950 75 A.F.T.R.2d 95-762, 95-1 USTC P 50,061 William V. SCOGGINS; Joyce M. Scoggins; Robert W.Christensen; Carrie L. Christensen, Petitioners-Appellants,v.COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-70696. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1993.Submission Deferred May 13, 1993.Resubmitted Jan. 25, 1995.Decided Feb. 1, 1995. John F. Hopkins and Jennifer […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.Gerald Glen BOYDEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Barry RUBIN; Working Alternatives, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56356. United States […]

46 F.3d 948 James E. BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James H. GOMEZ, Director, Department of Corrections, CharlesD. Marshall, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15178. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1994*.Decided Jan. 31, 1995. James E. Bryant, pro se. Catherine A. McBrien, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court […]

46 F.3d 944 Robert S. BORREGARD, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD; Federal AviationAdministration, Respondents. No. 93-70533. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 10, 1995*.Decided Jan. 31, 1995. Jay C. White, Redwood City, CA, for petitioner. Susan S. Caron, Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Admin., Washington, DC, for respondents. Petition to Review a Decision […]

46 F.3d 1138 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.David BEROUKHIM; Baroukh Beroukhim; BMB Properties, aCalifornia General Partnership; Yaghoub Beroukhim,Masoud Beroukhim; Shanin […]

46 F.3d 938 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 2771, Pens. Plan Guide P 23910CRaymond MONGELUZO, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BAXTER TRAVENOL LONG TERM DISABILITY BENEFIT PLAN, anunincorporated association; Connecticut General LifeInsurance Company, a Connecticut corporation; and DynamicControls, a division of Baxter Travenol Labs, a Californiacorporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55702. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1994.Decided […]

46 F.3d 1129 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.John David TIBBS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5458. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 93 310 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 25 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,612 The HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, Appellant,v.Bruce BABBITT, Secretary of the United States Department ofInterior, Irvin Feld and Kenneth Feld Productions, Inc.,d/b/a Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, andHawthorn Corporation, Appellees. No. 93-5339. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued […]

46 F.3d 1129 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Magaly Alvarez ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5079. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 929 1995-1 Trade Cases P 70,875, 41 Fed. R. Evid.Serv. 587The CITY OF LONG BEACH, State of California,Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,v.STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant,andExxon Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. Nos. 93-55156, 93-55157, 93-55214, 93-55215 and 93-55217. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1994.Decided Jan. 31, 1995. 1 James N. McCabe, […]

46 F.3d 1129 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jeffrey Alan WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5004. United States Court of Appeals, […]

46 F.3d 1128 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,v.Arthur B. JACOBY, Defendant Appellant. No. 94-6905. United States Court […]

46 F.3d 924 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Kelly Kay WEGNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30033. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 1994.Decided Jan. 30, 1995. Timothy J. Cavan, Cavan, Smith & Cavan, Billings, MT, for defendant-appellant. James E. Seykora, Asst. U.S. Atty., Billings, MT, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District […]

46 F.3d 908 The HOPI TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.The NAVAJO TRIBE, et al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-16448, 92-16510, 92-16839 and 92-16840. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 10, 1994.Decided Jan. 30, 1995. Tim Atkeson, Arnold & Porter, Denver, CO, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant, Hopi Tribe. Bruce R. Greene, Greene & […]

46 F.3d 1128 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee,v.Melvin MEREDITH, Defendant–Appellant. No. 94-6862. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth […]