Category: 29 F.3d ___

29 F.3d 993 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.DLG FINANCIAL CORP. and Daniel S. De La Garza,Defendants-Appellants.DLG FINANCIAL CORPORATION and Daniel S. De La Garza,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM OF the UNITED STATES, Board ofGovernors, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and TheFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation,Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-2944, 94-20013 and 94-10078. United States Court of […]

29 F.3d 98 74 A.F.T.R.2d 94-5371, 94-2 USTC P 50,357 Robert FERGUSON, John Allen, Joseph Arle, Paul Benchwick,Victor Blaha, Richard Doran, Lionel Gordon, Joseph Halpin,Ben Johnson, Thomas Katopody, Carlton Marshall, E. BargerMiller, Maurice Richards, John Rudy, II, Richard Sandler,Donna Sandler, Ira Sontupe, Harold Witham, Gail Witham,David Zuehlke, John McCurdy, a notice partner, KeithGaskell, a notice […]

29 F.3d 973 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rudolph W. BEUTTENMULLER and Larry R. Gill, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-9119. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 12, 1994. John D. Nation, Edward W. Moore, Jr., Kuehne & Moore, L.L.P., Dallas, TX, for Beuttenmuller. Ronald L. Goranson, Milner, Goranson, Sorrels, Udashen, Wells & Parker, Dallas, TX, for Gill. […]

29 F.3d 966 James BROWN and Jan Brown, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.FOREST OIL CORP., et al., Defendants,Production Operators, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.James Brown, et al., Plaintiffs,James BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PRODUCTION OPERATORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 93-4340, 93-5292. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1994. Steve A. Bryant, Bryant & McLean, Houston, TX, Joseph R. Joy, III, Lafayette, LA, for appellants in […]

29 F.3d 961 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David James SOLOMON, a/k/a Davis James Cormier, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5313. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1994.Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Sept. 8, 1994. Christopher A. Aberle, Metairie, LA (Court-appointed), for appellant. Josette L. Cassiere, Asst. U.S. Atty., Shreveport, LA, Duro J. Duplechin, […]

29 F.3d 953 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee Appellant-Cross-Appellant,v.Calvin BROWN and Brenda Brown Thurman, Defendants-AppellantsCross-Appellees,andJulio Castro, Defendant-Appellant,Constance Dianne Hendriex, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-2947. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1994. Marjorie A. Meyers, Bennett & Secrest, Houston, TX (Court-appointed), for Calvin Brown. Rosalind A. Kelley, Houston, TX (Court-appointed), for Brenda Thurman. Robert Augustus Harper, […]

29 F.3d 95 31 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1085, 25 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1445,Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,987 In re 680 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, and 54th and Fifth LandPartners, Debtors.680 FIFTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, and 54th and Fifth LandPartners, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IN REHABILITATION,Defendant-Appellee. No. 1337, Docket 93-5107. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued March 10, […]

29 F.3d 947 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rodney Eugene KNOWLES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-1557. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1994. Peter Fleury, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Ira R. Kirkendoll, Federal Public Defender, Fort Worth, TX, for appellant. Paul E. Gartner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Richard H. Stephens, U.S. Atty., Ft. Worth, TX, for appellee. […]

29 F.3d 940 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Edward JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-8875. United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug. 9, 1994. Nancy Hollander, Freedman, Boyd, Daniels, Peifer, Hollander, Guttmann & Goldberg, P.A., Albuquerque, NM, for appellant. Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Richard L. Durbin, Jr., Diane D. Kirstein, Asst. U.S. Attys., James H. DeAtley, Acting […]

29 F.3d 931 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2949, 128 Lab.Cas. P 11,166 CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION; General Committee ofAdjustment, United Transportation Union, WesternMaryland Railway Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-2407. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued May 11, 1994.Decided July 21, 1994. ARGUED: Stephen Bennett Caplis, Kevin Charles McCormick, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, MD, […]

29 F.3d 918 45 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 106, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 14051BNannie MICKLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services,Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-1891. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued Feb. 7, 1994.Decided July 18, 1994. ARGUED: Hugh Fairley O’Donnell, Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Inc., Castlewood, VA, for appellant. Robert Drum, Office of the […]

29 F.3d 914 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Danny K. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5119. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued May 13, 1994.Decided July 18, 1994. ARGUED: Thomas B. Shuttleworth, II, Shuttleworth, Ruloff, Giordano & Kahle, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellant. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee. ON BRIEF: […]

29 F.3d 908 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Harold R. WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5321. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued April 15, 1994.Decided July 18, 1994. ARGUED: Willis James Spaulding, Charlottesville, VA, for appellant. Joseph William Hooge Mott, Asst. U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, for appellee. ON BRIEF: Robert P. Crouch, Jr., U.S. Atty., Roanoke, VA, […]

29 F.3d 903 63 USLW 2147, 25 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1456,Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,015 In re C.S. ASSOCIATES, d/b/a University Nursing andRehabilitation Center, Debtor.UNITED JERSEY BANK, Appellant,v.Mitchell W. MILLER, Esq.; The City of Philadelphia; TheUnited States of America; Healthcare Services Group;Perloff Brothers, Inc.; Diane Vendetti; The SchoolDistrict of Philadelphia; Nicholas Canuso, Dr.; RaymondSilk, Dr. and Eugene […]

29 F.3d 886 63 USLW 2079, 45 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 88,Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 42,538 PENNSYLVANIA MEDICAL SOCIETY; Dr. James B. Regan, M.D.,v.Karen F. SNIDER, Individually and in her Official Capacityas Secretary of Public Welfare; Donna E. Shalala,Secretary of the United StatesDepartment of Health and Human Services,Pennsylvania Medical Society; James B. Regan, M.D., Appellants. No. 93-7775. […]

29 F.3d 88 31 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1090, 25 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 1440,Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,986 In re The LIONEL CORPORATION and Lionel Leisure, Inc., Debtors.Murray KLEIN, Stanley Zabar, and Saul Zabar, as Tenants inCommon, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.CIVALE & TROVATO, INC., Defendant-Appellant,Lionel Leisure, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,J. United Electrical Contracting Corp., Defendant. No. 1235, Docket 93-5085. United States Court of Appeals,Second […]

29 F.3d 878 GOVERNMENT OF the VIRGIN ISLANDSv.ROBINSON, Jackson, a/k/a Hughes, Lauren Lewell,Jackson Robinson, Appellant. No. 93-7675. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued April 21, 1994.Decided July 19, 1994. Thurston T. McKelvin, Federal Public Defender, Stephen A. Brusch (argued), Asst. Federal Public Defender, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas U.S. V.I., for appellant. Hugh P. Mabe, […]

29 F.3d 863 63 USLW 2080, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1687 Gustav A. ADAMS; Andrew F. Dopkins; and Robert Malcolm,Deceased, By His Executrix Lillian Malcolmv.TRUSTEES OF THE NEW JERSEY BREWERY EMPLOYEES’ PENSION TRUSTFUND; Local Union 843, International Brotherhood ofTeamsters; Falstaff Brewing Corporation; and Joseph M.Byrne Co., A Corporation of the State of New Jersey (NewarkNew […]

29 F.3d 855 24 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 23 ALA, INC., A Maryland Corporation; Larry H. Schatz, anindividual residing in, and a citizen of, theState of New York,v.CCAIR, INC., a Delaware Corporation ALA, Inc. and Larry H.Schatz, Appellants. No. 93-5688. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued May 13, 1994.Decided July 7, 1994. Thomas J. Bradley (argued), […]

29 F.3d 833 38 ERC 1889, 63 USLW 2038, 24 Envtl.L. Rep. 21,097 FMC CORPORATIONv.UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; Ronald Brown,Secretary of Commerce, in his official capacity;United States of America, Appellants. No. 92-1945. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Argued Sept. 15, 1993.Decided July 5, 1994. Vicki O’Meara, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Vicki L. Plaut […]

29 F.3d 83 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2838, 128 Lab.Cas. P 11,187 SCHWEIZER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellee,v.LOCAL 1752, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE,AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OFAMERICA, Respondent-Appellant. No. 1394, Docket 93-9233. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued March 17, 1994.Decided July 11, 1994. John A. Collins, Buffalo, NY (Lipsitz, Green, Fahringer, Roll, Salisbury & Cambria) […]

29 F.3d 828 Keith JONES, Appellant,v.Roland HOLVEY, I.A.; William H. Fauver, Commissioner;Eugene O’Neil, Chief H.O.; Vernon Johnson, Asst.Supt.; Gary Sheppard, H.O.; Lt. Bennett. No. 94-5011. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Submitted Pursuant to ThirdCircuit LAR 34.1(a)May 31, 1994.Decided July 21, 1994. Keith Jones, appellant pro se. Deborah T. Poritz, Atty. Gen. of N.J., Mary […]

29 F.3d 821 29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 560 MEREX A.G.; Merex Corporation and Peter C. Lachmann,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.FAIRCHILD WESTON SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 1817, Docket 93-9286. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued June 14, 1993.Decided July 14, 1994. Daniel J. O’Callaghan, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants. Roy A. Klein, Old Bethpage, NY, for defendant-appellee. Before: McLAUGHLIN and JACOBS, […]

29 F.3d 79 SEETRANSPORT WIKING TRADER SCHIFFAHRTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH &CO., KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.NAVIMPEX CENTRALA NAVALA and Uzinexportimport, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1599, Docket 93-9344. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued May 12, 1994.Decided July 8, 1994. L. Kevin Sheridan, Smithtown, NY (Radu Herescu, New York City, on the brief), for defendants-appellants. William J. Brady, III, New York City […]

29 F.3d 785 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1387 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.David THAI, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang HuyNgo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, a/k/a “L.V.Hong”, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 545, 541, 532, 550, 551, 690, 689, Dockets 92-1641(L),92-1657, 92-1658, 92-1659, 92-1660, 92-1661,92-1662, 92-1700. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued […]

29 F.3d 778 TOLTEC FABRICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.AUGUST INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1184, Docket 93-7972. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued March 1, 1994.Decided: July 8, 1994. Irwin M. Berg, New York City (Fuchsberg & Fuchsberg, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant. Gary S. Jacobson, New York City (Jacobson & Triggs, on the brief), for defendant-appellee. Before […]

29 F.3d 771 39 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1201 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Hector H. TUESTA-TORO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 93-2182. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard June 7, 1994.Decided July 25, 1994. Kevin G. Little, Los Angeles, CA, for appellant. Jose A. Quiles Espinosa, Sr. Litigation Counsel, Hato Rey, PR, with whom Guillermo […]

29 F.3d 76 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Martha MARINO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1567, Docket 93-1862. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued June 21, 1994.Decided July 8, 1994. David S. Zapp, Leonia, NJ; (Gerard E. Lynch, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Lisa M. Fleischman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, NY; (Zachary W. Carter, U.S. […]

29 F.3d 754 63 USLW 2068 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Richard A. HORN, et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 93-2041. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard May 3, 1994.Decided July 25, 1994. Ellen R. Meltzer, Sp. Counsel, Fraud Section, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, with whom Peter E. Papps, U.S. Atty., Concord, NH, and […]

29 F.3d 750 Thomas KELLIHER, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.GENERAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Defendant, Appellee. No. 93-2366. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard June 8, 1994.Decided July 20, 1994. Michael Avery with whom Jennifer Meyerhardt, Francis Marini and Marini & Turner were on brief, for appellant. John D. Boyle, with whom Boyle & Morrissey was on brief, […]

29 F.3d 742 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2979, 128 Lab.Cas. P 11,141,18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1585 LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION OF CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES OFMASSACHUSETTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFERS,WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL # 379,Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-2122. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard March 11, 1994.Decided July 19, 1994. Paul F. Kelly, […]

29 F.3d 733 UNITED STATES, Appellee,v.Daryl E. SINGLETERRY, Defendant, Appellant. No. 93-2232. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard May 3, 1994.Decided July 18, 1994. Stephen H. MacKenzie, Portland, ME, for appellant. Michael M. DuBose, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay P. McCloskey, U.S. Atty., Portland, ME, was on brief, for appellee. Before TORRUELLA, Circuit […]

29 F.3d 727 1994 A.M.C. 2513, 63 USLW 2060 VIMAR SEGUROS Y REASEGUROS, S.A., Plaintiffs, Appellants,v.M/V SKY REEFER, Her Engines, etc., and M.H. Maritima, S.A.,Defendants, Appellees. No. 93-2179. United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. Heard April 8, 1994.Decided July 7, 1994. Stanley McDermott, III with whom Sharyn Bernstein, Varet & Fink, P.C., Alexander Peltz, and […]

29 F.3d 720 308 U.S.App.D.C. 74 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Appellees,v.Mike ESPY, Secretary, United States Department ofAgriculture, et al., Appellants. Nos. 93-5127 and 93-5140. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 12, 1994.Decided July 22, 1994. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia […]

29 F.3d 715 308 U.S.App.D.C. 69, 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 705 In re SEALED CASE. No. 94-3019. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 17, 1994.Decided July 22, 1994. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Before EDWARDS, GINSBURG and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges. Opinion for […]

29 F.3d 706 308 U.S.App.D.C. 60 CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,Respondents,The City of New York and the Metropolitan TransportationAuthority of the State of New York, ChelseaProperty Owners, New York ConventionCenter DevelopmentCorporation, Intervenors.CITY OF NEW YORK and the Metropolitan TransportationAuthority of the State of New York, Petitioners,v.INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and […]

29 F.3d 697 308 U.S.App.D.C. 51 LIQUID CARBONIC INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Polk Power Partners, Limited Partnership, LavairCogeneration Limited Partnership, Intervenors.LIQUID CARBONIC INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Lavair Cogeneration Limited Partnership, Intervenor.LIQUID CARBONIC INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, Petitioner,v.FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,Lavair Cogeneration Limited Partnership, AES WR LimitedPartnership, Intervenors. Nos. 93-1095 to 93-1097. United […]

29 F.3d 689 308 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 63 USLW 2080, Fed.Sec. L. Rep. P 98,325 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Appellee,v.Paul A. BILZERIAN, Appellant. Nos. 91-5187, 93-5050. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 13, 1993.Decided July 22, 1994. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. […]

29 F.3d 682 308 U.S.App.D.C. 36, 63 USLW 2148,129 Lab.Cas. P 33,154,29 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1007,2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 289 Donald Gene HENTHORN, Appellant,v.DEPARTMENT OF NAVY, et al., Appellees. No. 92-5382. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued March 15, 1994.Decided July 22, 1994.Rehearing and Suggestion for RehearingIn Banc Denied Sept. 14, 1994.* […]

29 F.3d 67 63 USLW 2044 Spyridon KOLLIAS, Petitioner,v.D & G MARINE MAINTENANCE, State Insurance Fund, andDirector, Office of Workers’ CompensationPrograms, United States Department ofLabor, Respondents.B & A MARINE CO. and State Insurance Fund, Petitioners,v.Eleftherios GOUVATSOS and Director, Office of Workers’Compensation Programs, United States Department ofLabor, Respondents. Nos. 567, 741, Dockets 89-4114, 92-4109. United States […]

29 F.3d 655 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2897, 308 U.S.App.D.C.9, 63 USLW 2058,128 Lab.Cas. P 11,142 RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES’ ASSOCIATION; American Railway andAirway Supervisors’ Association; American Train DispatchersAssociation; Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers;Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes; Brotherhood ofRailroad Signalmen; Brotherhood Railway Carmen; HotelEmployees and Restaurant Employees International Union;International Association of Machinists and AerospaceWorkers; International Brotherhood […]

29 F.3d 647 308 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 39 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1195 UNITED STATES of Americav.David P. BAIRD, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.David P. BAIRD, Appellant.UNITED STATES of Americav.David P. BAIRD, Appellant. Nos. 90-3110, 92-3101 and 93-3016. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit.Argued April 21, 1994.Decided July 15, 1994. Appeal from the United States […]

29 F.3d 646 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 646 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 646 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 645 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]

29 F.3d 644 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision […]