Categories: 34 F.3d ___

34 F.3d 1066

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Thurman S. BOYKIN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
George E. CURRIE, Superintendent; Stanley Stewart; Hubert
Palmer Hines, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6004.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994

Decided Aug. 4, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-92-546)

Thurman S. Boykin, appellant pro se.

LaVee Hamer, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boykin v. Currie, No. CA-92-546 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED